| |
[04/05] Rekemeyer v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. An insurance carrier must show prejudice before it may disclaim coverage due to an insured's late notice of a Supplemental Uninsured/Underinsured Motorists claim.
[04/05] Argo Corp. v. Greater N.Y. Mut. Ins. Co. A primary insurer may disclaim insurance coverage based solely upon a late notice of lawsuit when an insured's late notice is unreasonable as a matter of law.
[04/04] People v. Jennings Defendant's request to modify a restitution order is granted where the trial court should have offset defendant's restitution obligation by his insurer's payments to the victim to the extent the payments were made to cover the costs of items included in the court's restitution order.
[03/31] Fayad v. Clarendon Nat'l Ins. Co. In an insurance coverage dispute, damage caused by a man-made event such as blasting is covered under defendant's all-risk insurance policy and does not fall within the policy's earth movement exclusion.
[03/31] Kamens v. Utica Mut. Ins. Co. An agreement by a wife to remove herself as the primary contingent beneficiary, on an annuity payable to her husband, allows the husband to select his own primary contingent beneficiary.
More... |